Client Advisory Sign-up
CommLaw Group Resources
CPNI Compliance Manual

Click image to view Sample


We offer a number of very helpful guides and manuals. Click here to view all of our resources.

What our Clients say...
"I have been extremely satisfied with our attorney and the entire CommLaw Group team; very professional, responsive, and great advice. I recommend you any chance I get. I really like your focus and how you can offer more than just pure legal advice (like the CPNI audits, Compliance and Reporting, etc.). These other value added services go beyond pure legal advice and make me think of your company more as a partner that can help me in many areas, with the right expertise at the right time."
"We are very satisfied with your firm's service and that is reason enough for us to keep on engaging your firm for any legal questions that we may have regarding telecom services. Your team's response time is great."
"I think you guys are night and day to the representation we have had in the past and I enjoy that I get answers that are thoughtful and well educated."
"We are definitely happy with your firm's services. It is as if you are an internal department of our company to whom we refer all telecom-related matters."
"Not a month goes by that I don't refer someone to your firm, which is the highest compliment that I can make... I am looking forward to continuing our long and mutually beneficial relationship."
"You all have been a real joy to work with, and I thank God every day for your competence, dedication, trust, guidance and counsel."
"We are against the government and high profile professionals, but... we will definitely win the case based on your support. Allison, Jackie, and [Chuck] have been doing a great job. Thank you always..."
"We hired Jonathan to represent our telecommunications licensing needs. At the time we were a start-up company with only a small amount of investment revenue. Attorney costs could have been enough to rethink the business plan. Jonathan worked with us on a payment plan basis which allowed us to focus on getting customers while he worked on getting us our licenses. He provided introductions to companies we eventually hired to assist us with tax issues and other FCC requirements. When we were interested in selling our company Jonathan made introductions to other telecom companies that were in the market for our type of company. He managed the contract process at every level through the acquisition. The best recommendation I can give is that when I go to do this again I will hire Jonathan."
"Jonathan is well-versed in a broad range of telecom regulatory matters. He uses his expertise to arrive at innovative, real-world business solutions while maintaining a high degree of professionalism."
"Jonathan is extremely knowledgeable in his field. He has provided invaluable telecom expertise to us and our subsidiary company on countless occasions. We would be lost without him. I highly recommend Jonathan!"
"Jonathan['s firm] was able to provide our ISP association with fresh responses to the RBOC FCC petitions as opposed to the boilerplate comments most law firms offered. Jonathan has a good understanding of the industry and how things work at the FCC."
—COO of a leading virtual
system company
—President of US operating
unit of foreign PTT
—CEO and Founder of a
nationwide Hosted
VoIP provider
—Senior Director of Telecom
of US operating unit
of international multi-media
conglomerate
—President & CEO of
regional CLEC
—Founder/CEO of enhanced
international communications carrier
—Controller of leading
provider of long distance,
wireless, point-of-sale and
carrier services
—Founder/CEO of
regional CLEC
—Vice President of
leading provider of
long distance, wireless,
point-of-sale and carrier
services
—CFO of enhanced
conferencing solutions
provider
—Member, Federation of
Internet Solutions Providers
of the Americas
Contact Information

Marashlian & Donahue, LLC

The CommLaw Group
1420 Spring Hill Road
Suite 401
McLean, Virginia 22102

Telephone: (703) 714-1300
Facsimile: (703) 714-1330

E-mail: mail@commlawgroup.com

FCC Releases New FCC Form 499-A; Updates Rules Regarding De Minimis Calculation, Audio-Bridging Providers, And Traffic Studies

On February 24, 2010 the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") released an updated FCC Form 499-A and instructions.  The form and instructions, which were released in anticipation of the upcoming April 1, 2010 filing deadline, memorialize several recent Universal Service Fund ("USF") rule changes and other updates which ensure consistency with the current USF contribution methodology.  The most notable changes are: (1) an increase to the de minimis threshold calculation factor in the de minimis worksheet to account for the recent material increases in the quarterly USF contribution factor, (2) the addition of a new category for "audio-bridging providers," and (3) reminders to interconnected voice over internet protocol ("VoIP") and wireless service providers to submit traffic studies along with their Form 499 submissions.  Each of these important changes is discussed below.

Updated de minimis threshold factor.  The most significant change to the Form 499-A instructions was the increase in the estimated contribution factor on the de minimis worksheet.  The FCC increased the estimated contribution factor to 12.3% (0.123) in order to account for the increase in quarterly USF contribution factors throughout the previous year; the current quarterly contribution factor is 14.1%, and is clearly expected to remain at these high levels given the upward adjustment to the de minimis threshold factor.   

The increase to the estimated contribution factor can be found in the FCC de minimis worksheet, which is contained at Figure 1 in the Form 499-A instructions.  Under the FCC's rules, all registered telecommunications service providers must execute this worksheet to determine if they meet the FCC's de minimis threshold.  And, the Form 499-A instructions explicitly state that all carriers with a 499 Filer Id must retain a completed copy of this worksheet in their records for five (5) years in the event of an audit.  The Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC") will also use the new estimated contribution factor to determine if a registered telecommunications service provider must contribute directly to the USF. Hence it is crucial that all potential contributors account for this increase.

Despite this increase, the FCC declined to raise the Limited International Revenue Exemption ("LIRE").  As a result, international telecommunications service providers who qualify for the LIRE and are de minimis are still unfairly penalized under the FCC's rules, as they may be required to pay additional USF on non-interstate traffic.  The result is that some carriers may contribute more than their total interstate revenue, which is arguably unlawful in light of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's ruling in Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel, et. al. v. FCC.  The FCC has yet to resolve this disputed issue.  We therefore urge clients affected by this conflict to seek counsel to fully understand their rights and duties.

Audio-bridging providers.  The FCC made several revisions to the FCC Form 499-A and instructions concerning audio-bridging providers.  First, the FCC added a category for "Audio Bridging (teleconferencing) Provider" on line 105 of the Form 499-A.  Previously, audio bridging providers were instructed to check "Other Toll" andenter "TSP" in the explanation field.  The instructions to the Form 499-A were also updated with an additional description of what constitutes an audio-bridging provider, consistent with the FCC's 2008 Intercall Order (classifying audio-bridging services as contribution eligible).

Reminder to file traffic studies.  The FCC added detailed language clarifying that all interconnected VoIP providers and commercial mobile radio service ("CMRS") providers relying on traffic studies must file these traffic studies when submitting FCC Form 499-Q and A to the FCC.  This new language does not alter or diminish the existing duty to file traffic studies. 

A copy of the new instructions, with the new FCC Form 499-A at the end, can be found here: http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2010.pdf   

CLIENT ADVISORY

All clients should review this information to ensure that their USF reporting practices consider the updates to the Form 499s and their respective instructions.  De minimis filers, especially those who qualify for the LIRE, should make note of the new increased estimated contribution factor, as this will likely impact  amounts reported on all upcoming FCC Form 499-Qs (the increased estimated contribution factor will not, however, affect amounts reported on the upcoming FCC Form 499-A since these are based on actual revenue).  Providers of audio-bridging services should also review the updated instructions to ensure accurate reporting and contribution.

Interconnected VoIP and wireless service providers who rely on traffic studies are also reminded to ensure that traffic studies are filed with USAC and the FCC when both FCC Form 499-Qs and 499-As are submitted.  The FCC's updates suggest that the agency will be more aggressive in its enforcement of this filing obligation.

Finally, all clients are advised to review the FCC Form 499 generally in preparation for the upcoming filing, due April 1, 2010.  Almost all registered Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers ("ITSPs"), i.e. those providers with a FCC 499 Filer ID, must file 499-A with the FCC, regardless of de minimis status.

To assist clients with this upcoming Form 499-A filing obligation, the firm's Commpliance Division will be contacting clients next week to begin gathering data in preparation for the filing.  In the meantime, clients are encouraged to review the updated FCC 499-A and instructions to ensure that they understand their annual reporting obligations.

Clients who have questions about the material outlined in this Advisory, or have legal questions about filing FCC Form 499-A should contact Chris Canter at: cac@commlawgroup.com or 703-714-1308.

Download PDF Advisory