Client Advisory Sign-up
CommLaw Group Resources
CPNI Compliance Manual

Click image to view Sample


We offer a number of very helpful guides and manuals. Click here to view all of our resources.

What our Clients say...
"I have been extremely satisfied with our attorney and the entire CommLaw Group team; very professional, responsive, and great advice. I recommend you any chance I get. I really like your focus and how you can offer more than just pure legal advice (like the CPNI audits, Compliance and Reporting, etc.). These other value added services go beyond pure legal advice and make me think of your company more as a partner that can help me in many areas, with the right expertise at the right time."
"We are very satisfied with your firm's service and that is reason enough for us to keep on engaging your firm for any legal questions that we may have regarding telecom services. Your team's response time is great."
"I think you guys are night and day to the representation we have had in the past and I enjoy that I get answers that are thoughtful and well educated."
"We are definitely happy with your firm's services. It is as if you are an internal department of our company to whom we refer all telecom-related matters."
"Not a month goes by that I don't refer someone to your firm, which is the highest compliment that I can make... I am looking forward to continuing our long and mutually beneficial relationship."
"You all have been a real joy to work with, and I thank God every day for your competence, dedication, trust, guidance and counsel."
"We are against the government and high profile professionals, but... we will definitely win the case based on your support. Allison, Jackie, and [Chuck] have been doing a great job. Thank you always..."
"We hired Jonathan to represent our telecommunications licensing needs. At the time we were a start-up company with only a small amount of investment revenue. Attorney costs could have been enough to rethink the business plan. Jonathan worked with us on a payment plan basis which allowed us to focus on getting customers while he worked on getting us our licenses. He provided introductions to companies we eventually hired to assist us with tax issues and other FCC requirements. When we were interested in selling our company Jonathan made introductions to other telecom companies that were in the market for our type of company. He managed the contract process at every level through the acquisition. The best recommendation I can give is that when I go to do this again I will hire Jonathan."
"Jonathan is well-versed in a broad range of telecom regulatory matters. He uses his expertise to arrive at innovative, real-world business solutions while maintaining a high degree of professionalism."
"Jonathan is extremely knowledgeable in his field. He has provided invaluable telecom expertise to us and our subsidiary company on countless occasions. We would be lost without him. I highly recommend Jonathan!"
"Jonathan['s firm] was able to provide our ISP association with fresh responses to the RBOC FCC petitions as opposed to the boilerplate comments most law firms offered. Jonathan has a good understanding of the industry and how things work at the FCC."
—COO of a leading virtual
system company
—President of US operating
unit of foreign PTT
—CEO and Founder of a
nationwide Hosted
VoIP provider
—Senior Director of Telecom
of US operating unit
of international multi-media
conglomerate
—President & CEO of
regional CLEC
—Founder/CEO of enhanced
international communications carrier
—Controller of leading
provider of long distance,
wireless, point-of-sale and
carrier services
—Founder/CEO of
regional CLEC
—Vice President of
leading provider of
long distance, wireless,
point-of-sale and carrier
services
—CFO of enhanced
conferencing solutions
provider
—Member, Federation of
Internet Solutions Providers
of the Americas
Contact Information

Marashlian & Donahue, LLC

The CommLaw Group
1420 Spring Hill Road
Suite 401
McLean, Virginia 22102

Telephone: (703) 714-1300
Facsimile: (703) 714-1330

E-mail: mail@commlawgroup.com

Changes to State Tax Law Target Out of State Businesses

In an effort to find new or expanded sources of revenue, an increasing number of states are targeting out-of-state businesses.  Specifically, a number of states have passed or are considering implementing so-called "Amazon Laws" aimed at collecting sales taxes from online out-of-state retailers.  Similarly, many states are forgoing the traditional "physical presence" standard for establishing nexus in favor of more expansive "economic presence" nexus standards for income and franchise tax purposes.  This advisory discusses two such examples.  

First, the Colorado legislature recently passed a unique variation on the "Amazon Law" concept.  The legislation imposes new reporting requirements on out-of-state entities and stiff penalties for a company's failure to follow the reporting requirements.  It remains to be seen whether other states will follow Colorado's lead and augment or replace their "Amazon Laws" with such reporting requirements.  Second, in a similar fashion, the New York Department of Taxation and Finance recently released a proposal suggesting that the state deviate from its traditional physical presence standard for determining nexus and adopt an economic presence nexus requirement.  

Colorado Imposes New Tax Reporting Obligations on Out-of-State Retailers

On February 24, 2010, Colorado Governor Bill Ritter (Dem.) signed House Bill 1193 into law.  This new law imposes extensive reporting requirements on out-of-state retailers with the intention of increasing compliance among such retailers with Colorado's sales and use tax.  Among other obligations, every retailer that does not collect Colorado sales tax on sales to Colorado purchasers must now:  1) notify Colorado purchasers that sales or use tax is due on certain purchases from the retailer and that Colorado law requires the purchaser to file a sales and use tax return; and 2) annually report all sales to Colorado purchasers, including dates of purchases, amounts of purchases and categories of purchases, to the Colorado Department of Revenue ("CO DOR").  The new law imposes a penalty of $5 on out-of-state retailers for each sale to a Colorado purchaser without the required notice.  Out-of-state retailers will also be subject to a $10 penalty for each purchaser not included in their annual report to the CO DOR.

Many online retailers have already altered their business models to account for Colorado's new tax compliance requirements.  For example, Amazon has severed its relationship with all of its online business affiliates located in Colorado as result of the new measure.

New York Proposes Expanding its Corporate Franchise Tax to Out-of-State Businesses with No Physical Presence in the State

In late February, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance ("NY DTAF") proposed a sweeping reform of its corporate tax system.  Notably, the proposed reform would eliminate the previous requirement that an out-of-state business have at least some sort of physical presence in the state before New York would attempt to impose its corporate franchise tax on the out-of-state business.  Under the proposed reform, an out-of-state corporation would be subject to New York's franchise tax if (i) "it has receipts within [New York] of one million dollars or more in the taxable year"; (ii) "it has issued credit cards to one thousand or more customers who have a mailing address within [New York] as of the last day of its taxable year"; (iii) "it has merchant customer contracts with merchants and the total number of locations covered by those contracts equals one thousand or more locations in [New York] to whom the corporation remitted payments for credit card transactions during the taxable year"; or (iv) the "sum of the number of customers" described in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph plus the "number of locations covered by its contracts" described in subparagraph (iii) "equals one thousand or more."

The NY DTAF also seeks to make significant changes to a number of other areas of New York's current corporate tax law -- including apportionment of business income, net operating losses ("NOLs"), and combined reporting. 

Client Advisory

New York's reforms currently remain just a proposal and must be enacted by the state legislature before becoming effective. Thus,the ultimate shape of any New York corporate tax law reform may look quite different than this initial proposal.  On the other hand, clients who are concerned with potential tax compliance issues under Colorado's new law should contact the firm immediately, as most of the new compliance requirements are already in effect. 

Clients who are concerned with how either of the above-described changes to state tax law may affect their business should contact Allison Rule at adr@commlawgroup.com or 703-714-1312.