Client Advisory Sign-up
CommLaw Group Resources
CPNI Compliance Manual

Click image to view Sample


We offer a number of very helpful guides and manuals. Click here to view all of our resources.

What our Clients say...
"I have been extremely satisfied with our attorney and the entire CommLaw Group team; very professional, responsive, and great advice. I recommend you any chance I get. I really like your focus and how you can offer more than just pure legal advice (like the CPNI audits, Compliance and Reporting, etc.). These other value added services go beyond pure legal advice and make me think of your company more as a partner that can help me in many areas, with the right expertise at the right time."
"We are very satisfied with your firm's service and that is reason enough for us to keep on engaging your firm for any legal questions that we may have regarding telecom services. Your team's response time is great."
"I think you guys are night and day to the representation we have had in the past and I enjoy that I get answers that are thoughtful and well educated."
"We are definitely happy with your firm's services. It is as if you are an internal department of our company to whom we refer all telecom-related matters."
"Not a month goes by that I don't refer someone to your firm, which is the highest compliment that I can make... I am looking forward to continuing our long and mutually beneficial relationship."
"You all have been a real joy to work with, and I thank God every day for your competence, dedication, trust, guidance and counsel."
"We are against the government and high profile professionals, but... we will definitely win the case based on your support. Allison, Jackie, and [Chuck] have been doing a great job. Thank you always..."
"We hired Jonathan to represent our telecommunications licensing needs. At the time we were a start-up company with only a small amount of investment revenue. Attorney costs could have been enough to rethink the business plan. Jonathan worked with us on a payment plan basis which allowed us to focus on getting customers while he worked on getting us our licenses. He provided introductions to companies we eventually hired to assist us with tax issues and other FCC requirements. When we were interested in selling our company Jonathan made introductions to other telecom companies that were in the market for our type of company. He managed the contract process at every level through the acquisition. The best recommendation I can give is that when I go to do this again I will hire Jonathan."
"Jonathan is well-versed in a broad range of telecom regulatory matters. He uses his expertise to arrive at innovative, real-world business solutions while maintaining a high degree of professionalism."
"Jonathan is extremely knowledgeable in his field. He has provided invaluable telecom expertise to us and our subsidiary company on countless occasions. We would be lost without him. I highly recommend Jonathan!"
"Jonathan['s firm] was able to provide our ISP association with fresh responses to the RBOC FCC petitions as opposed to the boilerplate comments most law firms offered. Jonathan has a good understanding of the industry and how things work at the FCC."
—COO of a leading virtual
system company
—President of US operating
unit of foreign PTT
—CEO and Founder of a
nationwide Hosted
VoIP provider
—Senior Director of Telecom
of US operating unit
of international multi-media
conglomerate
—President & CEO of
regional CLEC
—Founder/CEO of enhanced
international communications carrier
—Controller of leading
provider of long distance,
wireless, point-of-sale and
carrier services
—Founder/CEO of
regional CLEC
—Vice President of
leading provider of
long distance, wireless,
point-of-sale and carrier
services
—CFO of enhanced
conferencing solutions
provider
—Member, Federation of
Internet Solutions Providers
of the Americas
Contact Information

Marashlian & Donahue, LLC

The CommLaw Group
1420 Spring Hill Road
Suite 205
McLean, Virginia 22102

Telephone: (703) 714-1300
Facsimile: (703) 714-1330

E-mail: mail@commlawgroup.com

USAC Policy Regarding the Calculation of the De Minimis Exemption Creates Issues for Many Providers

Our firm prepared the following Advisory to update clients about ongoing Universal Service Fund ("USF" or "Fund") reporting and contribution obligations.  As most clients are already aware, the Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC" or "Commission") rules mandate that all interstate telecommunications service providers ("ITSPs") must contribute directly to the Federal USF if their annual interstate and international telecommunications revenue exceeds $10,000.00.  ITSPs with revenue under the $10,000.00 threshold are considered de minimis and are not required to contribute directly to the USF (but will pay USF pass-through amounts to underlying carriers).

Calculation of whether an ITSP meets the de minimis requirement is complicated by the quarterly contribution schedule adopted by the Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC").  Under the current Federal USF contribution methodology, all ITSPs must evaluate their contribution obligations on a quarterly basis.  Non-de minimis filers must file the FCC Form 499-Q ("Form 499-Q" or "499-Q") and contribute directly to the USF.  Filers who qualify for de minimis status are not required to contribute directly to the USF or file 499-Qs (however, under the FCC's rules, they must execute a de minimis worksheet and retain this as proof of indirect contributor status for three (3) years in the event of an audit, see: http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/filing.html, at: FCC Form 499-Q Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet).

This reporting methodology may seem straightforward at first.  However, it can be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to accurately determine whether a filer meets the FCC's de minimis threshold throughout the year, because the FCC's USF contribution factors are not known in advance, and because USAC estimates contribution based on a variety of factors.

Actual Contribution Based on USF factors Unknown at the Time of Filing

Under the current USF methodology, USF contribution is based on "projected" revenue for the upcoming quarter (Line 420 (d) and (e) of FCC Form499-Q, not actual revenue for the preceding quarter).  For example, in the 499-Q due May 1st, filers report actual revenue for the first quarter ("Q1") (i.e. January 1st through March 31st) and projected revenue for the third quarter ("Q3") (i.e. July 1st through September 30th).  The filer's contribution is based on its projected revenue for Q3.

However, the actual USF factor is unknown at the time of filing, because the FCC sets the USF factor for the projected quarter two or three weeks in advance of the start of the upcoming quarter.  In other words, USAC does not determine the actual Fund contribution factor for the next quarter until shortly before the close of the current quarter and well after filers have submitted their 499-Qs.  (In the above example, the newly announced Fund contribution factor would apply to the third quarter, i.e., period of . July 1st through September 30th.) 

USAC then issues invoices to 499-Q filers on or around the 15th of the next month using the new contribution factor and based on the projected revenue reported.  Because the actual contribution factor is released after a filer submits its 499-Q, this creates a dilemma for many filers.

De Minimis Worksheet not Used by USAC to Determine De Minimis Status

Filers who believe that they may qualify for the Commission's de minimis exemption, and therefore not need to file 499-Qs, complete a de minimis worksheet each quarter to determine whether they meet the criteria for de minimis status.  Because, as noted above, the actual contribution factor is released after a filer submits its 499-Q, USAC provides an estimated contribution factor for filers to calculate their potential USF contribution. 

Unfortunately, it appears that USAC does not use the estimated contribution factor for any of its own calculations.  According to USAC staff, the estimated contribution factor is provided along with the de minimis worksheet merely as a courtesy for filers to "estimate" their contribution obligations and is not intended to reflect actual contribution obligations.

If an issue or dispute arises regarding reporting or contribution obligations, instead of the estimated contribution factor, USAC uses the actual contribution factor, which is released several weeks after the submission of 499-Qs in question, to determine de minimis status.  Because filers do not know the applicable contribution factor at the time of filing the 499-Q, any de minimis calculations based on the estimated contribution factor will be rough estimates instead of specific amounts and will not be recognized by USAC in the event of a dispute.  Thus, despite the fact that the FCC's rules require filers to retain their de minimis worksheets to assist with audits, USAC will not rely on them should some issue arise.

USAC Estimations of Projected Revenue

In addition to the quarterly 499-Qs, all ITSPs -- regardless of whether they qualify for de minimis status or not -- must annually submit a FCC Form 499-A ("499-A").  The 499-A represents a true-up system to ensure that projected payments coincide with actual revenue.  On the 499-A, a filer reports all actual revenue from the previous year.  USAC matches this against the contributions made on projected revenue.  If a filer has under-contributed, USAC issues a bill for the difference.  If a filer has over-paid, USAC issues a credit.  Every November, USAC releases actual refunds, so any credits left in an account can be transferred back to the ITSP's bank account.

If USAC does not receive Annual and Quarterly Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets (i.e., FCC Form 499-A and FCC Form 499-Q) from an ITSP, it will estimate revenue for the ITSP.  FCC rules require USAC to estimate revenue for all active companies that fail to file Forms 499-A and 499-Q.  To do so, USAC's administrators will use estimated revenue to assess fees and obligations in the same manner as data filed on actual forms.

In addition, similar to the situation noted above regarding reporting and contribution disputes, instead of the estimated contribution factor, USAC uses the actual contribution factors to produce these end-of-year estimations.  Once again, because the actual contribution factor is not available at the time of filing the 499-Q and determination of de minimis status using the de minimis worksheets, USAC's end-of-year estimations could differ greatly from any de minimis calculations made by an ITSP during the year.  This means that a filer can be considered de minimis for its FCC Form 499-A, but still be "estimated" as a direct contributor throughout the year based on actual fee factors. 

USAC will notify companies for whom an estimate will result in change in status from de minimis to non-de minimis status.  This may provide a company with the opportunity to file its own information and allow the company to correct any over-estimation of contribution obligations by USAC.  However, if a company is forced to file a revenue reporting form after USAC has generated an estimate, that filed form will be treated as a revision and may be rejected if the revision window has closed (i.e. one-year for the FCC Form 499-A and 45-days for the FCC Form 499-Q).

CLIENT ADVISORY

USAC's policy leaves many filers in an unfortunate predicament.  Filers who decide not to submit a 499-Q based on de minimis status could be left with no way to defend their decision, because USAC will not recognize calculations based on the de minimis worksheet.  As a result, we recommend the following courses of action:

  • We encourage all de minimis clients to evaluate their filing obligations every quarter to ensure that they will not qualify as a direct contributor for the year
  • All clients who report non-de minimis on FCC Form 499-A should file FCC Form 499-Qs throughout the year, even if revenue is projected as de minimis for a particular quarter.
  • Since the actual contribution factor cannot be accurately determined in advance, clients who have projected revenue close to the FCC's de minimis threshold should contact the firm to evaluate their FCC Form 499 filing obligations.

Clients who need ongoing assistance with FCC Form 499 filing may subscribe to the firm's Compliance and Reporting Services ("C&R Services").  Through these services, the firm's Commpliance Division can handle all ongoing regulatory compliance obligations, including FCC Form 499, CPNI, PIU certification, International Traffic Reports, and related filings, on a low cost, fixed-fee basis.  For more information about C&R Services, please contact Chris Canter at cac@commlawgroup.com.