Client Advisory Sign-up
CommLaw Group Resources
CPNI Compliance Manual

Click image to view Sample


We offer a number of very helpful guides and manuals. Click here to view all of our resources.

What our Clients say...
"I have been extremely satisfied with our attorney and the entire CommLaw Group team; very professional, responsive, and great advice. I recommend you any chance I get. I really like your focus and how you can offer more than just pure legal advice (like the CPNI audits, Compliance and Reporting, etc.). These other value added services go beyond pure legal advice and make me think of your company more as a partner that can help me in many areas, with the right expertise at the right time."
"We are very satisfied with your firm's service and that is reason enough for us to keep on engaging your firm for any legal questions that we may have regarding telecom services. Your team's response time is great."
"I think you guys are night and day to the representation we have had in the past and I enjoy that I get answers that are thoughtful and well educated."
"We are definitely happy with your firm's services. It is as if you are an internal department of our company to whom we refer all telecom-related matters."
"Not a month goes by that I don't refer someone to your firm, which is the highest compliment that I can make... I am looking forward to continuing our long and mutually beneficial relationship."
"You all have been a real joy to work with, and I thank God every day for your competence, dedication, trust, guidance and counsel."
"We are against the government and high profile professionals, but... we will definitely win the case based on your support. Allison, Jackie, and [Chuck] have been doing a great job. Thank you always..."
"We hired Jonathan to represent our telecommunications licensing needs. At the time we were a start-up company with only a small amount of investment revenue. Attorney costs could have been enough to rethink the business plan. Jonathan worked with us on a payment plan basis which allowed us to focus on getting customers while he worked on getting us our licenses. He provided introductions to companies we eventually hired to assist us with tax issues and other FCC requirements. When we were interested in selling our company Jonathan made introductions to other telecom companies that were in the market for our type of company. He managed the contract process at every level through the acquisition. The best recommendation I can give is that when I go to do this again I will hire Jonathan."
"Jonathan is well-versed in a broad range of telecom regulatory matters. He uses his expertise to arrive at innovative, real-world business solutions while maintaining a high degree of professionalism."
"Jonathan is extremely knowledgeable in his field. He has provided invaluable telecom expertise to us and our subsidiary company on countless occasions. We would be lost without him. I highly recommend Jonathan!"
"Jonathan['s firm] was able to provide our ISP association with fresh responses to the RBOC FCC petitions as opposed to the boilerplate comments most law firms offered. Jonathan has a good understanding of the industry and how things work at the FCC."
—COO of a leading virtual
system company
—President of US operating
unit of foreign PTT
—CEO and Founder of a
nationwide Hosted
VoIP provider
—Senior Director of Telecom
of US operating unit
of international multi-media
conglomerate
—President & CEO of
regional CLEC
—Founder/CEO of enhanced
international communications carrier
—Controller of leading
provider of long distance,
wireless, point-of-sale and
carrier services
—Founder/CEO of
regional CLEC
—Vice President of
leading provider of
long distance, wireless,
point-of-sale and carrier
services
—CFO of enhanced
conferencing solutions
provider
—Member, Federation of
Internet Solutions Providers
of the Americas
Contact Information

Marashlian & Donahue, LLC

The CommLaw Group
1420 Spring Hill Road
Suite 401
McLean, Virginia 22102

Telephone: (703) 714-1300
Facsimile: (703) 714-1330

E-mail: mail@commlawgroup.com

States Continue Drive to Assert Jurisdiction Over Interconnected VoIP Services

Jurisdictional lines between federal and state regulation of Interconnected VoIP services are becoming increasingly blurred as states move to assert jurisdiction over both nomadic and static Interconnected VoIP service offerings.  The trend toward increased state regulation of these services continues as the Maine and Vermont public utility commissions released orders asserting jurisdiction over the intrastate "fixed" VoIP services offered in those states, and in Illinois where a new law requires providers of fixed or nomadic Interconnected VoIP services to register with the Illinois Commerce Commission ("ICC").

 In an Order released October 27, 2010, the Maine Public Service Commission ("MPSC") determined that the fixed VoIP services offered by Time Warner Digital Cable Telephone, LLC ("Time Warner") and Comcast Phone of Maine, LLC ("Comcast") are "telephone services" under Maine law and, are subject to the MPSC’s jurisdiction.  In the Order the MPSC determined that the VoIP services offered by Time Warner and Comcast are offered as substitutes for traditional telephone service.  The MPSC also stated that placing and receiving VoIP calls is "indistinguishable" from placing or receiving traditional circuit-switched telephone calls.  The MPSC addressed the question of federal preemption, and concluded that not exercising jurisdiction over Comcast and Time Warner in anticipation of federal preemption would be inconsistent with its responsibility to consumers in Maine.

 The Vermont Public Service Board ("Board") reached a similar conclusion in an Order released October 28, 2010, and held that "fixed" VoIP services are "telecommunications services" under Vermont state law, and fall within the Board’s jurisdiction.  Unlike the MPSC, the Board explicitly concluded that its jurisdiction over nomadic VoIP services, such as Vonage’s DigitalVoice service and AT&T’s CallVantage, is preempted by federal law. The PSB concluded further that fixed VoIP services allow the provider to distinguish between the interstate and intrastate components of the service and therefore are within the jurisdiction of the PSB.  It remains to be seen how the Board will reconcile its holding with the FCC’s recent Declaratory Ruling finding that states are not preempted by federal law from assessing state Universal Service Fund contribution obligations on the intrastate component of nomadic Interconnected VoIP services.

 Legislation signed into law in Illinois is also pushing the boundaries of state jurisdiction over Interconnected VoIP services.  An amendment to the High Speed Internet Services and Information Technology Act will require providers of intrastate nomadic and fixed Interconnected VoIP services to register with the ICC.  The law will go into effect on December 1, 2010, and will require all Interconnected VoIP providers to register by January 1, 2011. Thereafter, new providers will be required to register at least 30 days prior to their provision of service within Illinois, and will be required to notify the ICC of any change in registration information within 5 business days after the change.