Client Advisory Sign-up
CommLaw Group Resources
CPNI Compliance Manual

Click image to view Sample


We offer a number of very helpful guides and manuals. Click here to view all of our resources.

What our Clients say...
"I have been extremely satisfied with our attorney and the entire CommLaw Group team; very professional, responsive, and great advice. I recommend you any chance I get. I really like your focus and how you can offer more than just pure legal advice (like the CPNI audits, Compliance and Reporting, etc.). These other value added services go beyond pure legal advice and make me think of your company more as a partner that can help me in many areas, with the right expertise at the right time."
"We are very satisfied with your firm's service and that is reason enough for us to keep on engaging your firm for any legal questions that we may have regarding telecom services. Your team's response time is great."
"I think you guys are night and day to the representation we have had in the past and I enjoy that I get answers that are thoughtful and well educated."
"We are definitely happy with your firm's services. It is as if you are an internal department of our company to whom we refer all telecom-related matters."
"Not a month goes by that I don't refer someone to your firm, which is the highest compliment that I can make... I am looking forward to continuing our long and mutually beneficial relationship."
"You all have been a real joy to work with, and I thank God every day for your competence, dedication, trust, guidance and counsel."
"We are against the government and high profile professionals, but... we will definitely win the case based on your support. Allison, Jackie, and [Chuck] have been doing a great job. Thank you always..."
"We hired Jonathan to represent our telecommunications licensing needs. At the time we were a start-up company with only a small amount of investment revenue. Attorney costs could have been enough to rethink the business plan. Jonathan worked with us on a payment plan basis which allowed us to focus on getting customers while he worked on getting us our licenses. He provided introductions to companies we eventually hired to assist us with tax issues and other FCC requirements. When we were interested in selling our company Jonathan made introductions to other telecom companies that were in the market for our type of company. He managed the contract process at every level through the acquisition. The best recommendation I can give is that when I go to do this again I will hire Jonathan."
"Jonathan is well-versed in a broad range of telecom regulatory matters. He uses his expertise to arrive at innovative, real-world business solutions while maintaining a high degree of professionalism."
"Jonathan is extremely knowledgeable in his field. He has provided invaluable telecom expertise to us and our subsidiary company on countless occasions. We would be lost without him. I highly recommend Jonathan!"
"Jonathan['s firm] was able to provide our ISP association with fresh responses to the RBOC FCC petitions as opposed to the boilerplate comments most law firms offered. Jonathan has a good understanding of the industry and how things work at the FCC."
—COO of a leading virtual
system company
—President of US operating
unit of foreign PTT
—CEO and Founder of a
nationwide Hosted
VoIP provider
—Senior Director of Telecom
of US operating unit
of international multi-media
conglomerate
—President & CEO of
regional CLEC
—Founder/CEO of enhanced
international communications carrier
—Controller of leading
provider of long distance,
wireless, point-of-sale and
carrier services
—Founder/CEO of
regional CLEC
—Vice President of
leading provider of
long distance, wireless,
point-of-sale and carrier
services
—CFO of enhanced
conferencing solutions
provider
—Member, Federation of
Internet Solutions Providers
of the Americas
Contact Information

Marashlian & Donahue, LLC

The CommLaw Group
1420 Spring Hill Road
Suite 401
McLean, Virginia 22102

Telephone: (703) 714-1300
Facsimile: (703) 714-1330

E-mail: mail@commlawgroup.com

Rural Telcos Lobby FCC to Expand Contributor Base as Part of USF Contribution Reform

With last year's reforms to the Intercarrier Compensation regime and Universal Service Fund (“USF”) distribution system, moves which clearly shifted the policy focus from the switched telephone network of today to the Broadband networks of tomorrow, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) now stands poised to tackle the sticky issue of how to pay for these reforms. Although the FCC has yet to announce the much-anticipated USF Contribution Reform Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”), powerful lobbies are already hard at work seeking to influence the Commission; none has been more active than the National Telecommunications Cooperative Association (“NTCA”), a trade group representing the interests of rural, independent telephone companies.

As the ink was still drying on the ICC/USF Reform proceedings, NTCA was already busy softening up the FCC with a rash of Ex Parte meetings, phone conferences and written submissions detailing the associations positions in support of retaining the current revenue-based USF contribution system and significantly expanding the base of contribution-eligible revenue to include revenue from broadband Internet Access, non-Interconnected VoIP, and text messaging services.  These positions were recently reiterated in the January 10th Ex Parte submission linked here:  http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021753079

NTCA argues that the size of the USF is not the problem and that the real issue is the dwindling size of the telecommunication service revenue base subject to contribution requirements.   According to NTCA, the FCC has ample authority and good reason to expand the scope of contribution-eligible services revenue to include broadband Internet Access, non-Interconnected VoIP, and text messaging services revenue and argues that expansion of the contribution base will all but resolve concerns regarding the growth of the Fund. 

In specific reference to non-Interconnected VoIP, NTCA states:

[t]he question with respect to assessment of such services is merely a definitional one, rather than a jurisdictional one.  The current rule defining interconnected VoIP illogically results in assessment for those services that offer the ability to place  and receive calls.  This definition makes little sense, however, in the context of a USF program that seeks to support the networks upon which traffic rides.  On a “per session” basis, the fact that data may be flowing in one direction or two (or the fact that a session could only be initiated from or received by a given station) is irrelevant to the burden placed on the network by the session as it occurs or the benefit derived by the user. Such disparity also promotes regulatory gamesmanship, where providers can structure functionally equivalent offerings to evade contributions obligations.

We urge all clients to review NTCA’s Ex Parte in its entirety and to actively monitor activity in WC Docket No. 06-122 and CC Docket No. 96-45 over the coming days and weeks.  With the USF Quarterly Contribution Factor at an all-time high of 17.9% during Q1 2012 and pressures -- internal and external -- continuing to mount, the FCC is likely to take action in the near future.  Yet as NTCA’s actions demonstrate, waiting around until the FCC acts is not a pre-requisite to ensuring your company and your industry segment’s voice is heard on what is certainly one of, if not the single most important regulatory issue of the past decade and one which is likely to impact the communications industry for decades into the future.

If you are interested in participating in the upcoming USF Contribution Reform rulemaking proceeding and would like to begin formulating strategies and policy positions, please contact Jonathan Marashlian at jsm@commlawgroup.com or by telephone:  703-714-1313.